MCAT scores are remaining stable over time and this makes sense.
The number of medical schools in the country has increased about 10% in the past 25 years.
The number of optometry schools since I graduated 25 years ago is up almost 50%.
It’s not that difficult to sort through the data. Some is complex, but not all. Study has begun.
Thus far it reflects common sense.
NBEO (the finance cmte) presented a report to ARBO HoD. We compared ourselves to others, too. There were no pointed questions. We didn’t leave room for doubt. Everyone was invited to visit or ask more questions. Our entire presentation was based upon submitted questions, actually.
Arguing to avoid science testing, to use virtual proctoring for high-stakes licensure exams, bashing our small profession’s board exam due to the pass rates, making up weird conspiracy theories… jumped the shark. It’s very bad advocacy to increase doubt, increase angst, and lose the public trust. No one could make this up.
The lesson that will come out is that: 1) testing has known, demanded requirements in 2025; that’s reality; 2) if you take the top half of a pool, they score better; if you take the entire pool, some score far worse; 3) NBEO needed new IT and was charged with creating a new test; if you compare us to others, our spending is favorable; if you compare us by size, the numbers make sense; 4) being angry doesn’t make one correct; 5) NBEO is accountable to the public and to regulatory agencies; bring it; 6) NBEO demonstrates transparency via audits, 990s, broad cmtes, broad councils, the state board review cmte (NBERC), external psychometrics, external security, visitors/observers, a public member in governance, academics in governance, state board folks in governance… golly; 7) medicine, pharmacy, nursing, chiropractic, etc. create their nat’l licensing exams; so does optometry; that’s a plus, not a minus.