Alternative Methods of Refraction: A Comparison of Three Techniques.

[ODwire.org NewsBot]

Alternative Methods of Refraction: A Comparison of Three Techniques. Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Jan 14; Authors: Smith K, Weissberg E, Travison TG PURPOSE.: In the developing world, refractive error is a common untreated cause of visual impairment. Lay people may use portable tools to overcome this issue. This study compares three methods of measuring spherical refractive error (SE) performed by a lay technician to a subjective refraction (SR) in a controlled clinical setting and a field trial. METHODS.: Fifty subjects from Boston, MA (mean age, 24.3 y +/- 1.5) and 50 from Nicaragua (mean age, 40 y +/- 13.7) were recruited. Measures (performed on right eye only) included (1) AdSpecs, adjustable spectacles; (2) Focometer, focusable telescope; (3) Predetermined Lens Refraction (PLR), prescripted lens choices; (4) SR. Examiners were masked and techniques randomized. Student t-test compared mean SE determined by each method (95% confidence intervals). AdSpecs repeatability was evaluated by repeating measures of SE and visual acuity (VA). RESULTS.: Mean (SD) SE for Boston subjects determined by SR was -2.46 D (3.2). Mean (SD) SE for AdSpecs, Focometer -2.41 D (2.69), -2.80 D (2.82). Among the 30 Boston subjects considered in analyses of PLR data (see Methods), PLR and SR obtained mean (SD) values of -0.65 D (1.36) and -0.41 D (1.67), respectively, a statistically significant difference of -0.24 D (p = 0.046, t = 2.09). Mean PLR SE had greatest deviation from SR, 0.67 D. 20/20 VA was achieved by SR, AdSpecs, Focometer, and PLR in 98, 88, 84, 96% of subjects. Mean (SD) SE for Nicaragua subjects determined by SR was +0.51 D (0.71). Mean (SD) SE for AdSpecs, Focometer, and PLR was +0.68 D (0.83), +0.42 D (1.13), +0.27 D (0.79). Mean PLR SE had the greatest deviation from the SR by 0.24 D, which was a statistically significant difference. 20/20 VA was achieved by SR, AdSpecs, Focometer, and PLR in 78, 66, 66, 88% of subjects. Repeated measures by AdSpecs were highly correlated. CONCLUSIONS.: Although the mean value obtained by each technique may be similar to that obtained by SR, substantial and clinically meaningful differences may exist in some individuals; however, where SR is unavailable they could be a feasible alternative. PMID: 20081549 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

More...