Marin lags among counties in providing eye care to low-income children - Marin Independent...

ODwire.org NewsBot

NewsBot
Staff member
Jul 30, 2007
8,303
60
0
School/Org
Newsbot U
City
Barre
State
VT
California has not raised rates for optometric care for years, and dropped eyeglasses for adults in 2010 or so. So it's not surprising that few O.D.s can accept Medi Cal patients.
Meanwhile a scandal broke out after a reporter wrote about an exec at a state university making 270,000 plus benefits. Ca pays far too much in salaries , and we get the scraps.
$40 /exam, $17 frame, and a tiny fee for dispensing.
However, I commend Dr. Day , who sees the MC patients, as I do.
 
This is the third article in the past week that criticizes California doctors for the difficulties Medi-Cal patients face while trying to access care. I'm tired of seeing journalists villify us without telling the other side of the story. Our associations should be going on the defense when things like this are spread publicly.

The writer of this article makes a brief reference to the reasons why the San Anselmo practice stopped seeing Medi-Cal patients, but she was too lazy to dig a little more deeply into those problems and articulate them for the reader.

One of the comments from Ronrico Padroni further illustrates the gap in understanding. He thinks that Partnership pays more than Medi-Cal:
"PHC is a typical private insurance corporation, and pays typical reimbursement rates, and about 10 months ago announced that they are now offering a "vision plan (VP). Larkspur Optometry charges the same rates for eye ware to PHC as they do to any other private insurance company or private customers, so we will be seeing more than just two optometrists in Marin serving PHC customers as soon as they find out. The old Medi-Cal stigma is gone now."
 
I found this article to especially aggravating:
http://www.californiahealthline.org...ance-billing-of--medical-patients-on-the-rise

Advocates Say Balance Billing of Medi-Cal Patients on the Rise
Advocates say that health care providers increasingly are balance billing Medi-Cal beneficiaries -- a practice that violates state law, the Los Angeles Times reports (Zamosky, Los Angeles Times, 9/18).

Balance billing refers to out-of-network providers charging patients for the difference between what patients' insurers cover and what providers charge for the service (California Healthline, 2/18).

Details of Issue
Advocates say balance billing of Medi-Cal beneficiaries has been on the rise in the past year.

Stephanie Lee, the supervising attorney at the Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County's health consumer center, said, "We get a significant number of people with Medi-Cal being impermissibly balance billed," adding, "The services these patients get should be free, and then they get a nasty surprise."

Lee said that the number of phone calls to her organization's help line doubled in the last year, with many being complaints about balance billing among Medi-Cal beneficiaries.

Meanwhile, Georgia Burke, the directing attorney at Justice in Aging, said the issue stems from providers and patients misunderstanding the legal protections against balance billing.

For instance, Burke said that providers who accept Medicare patients but do not participate in Medi-Cal often ask for payment from patients who are dually eligible for the two programs. However, even if providers do not participate in Medi-Cal, they should bill the program for balances leftover after Medicare payments. Under the law, providers are required to "accept as payment in full" what the two programs pay for services, according to the Times.

Kata Kertesz, a policy attorney at the Center for Medicare Advocacy, said such misunderstandings could lead to patients paying bills they should not or forgoing care. "Frequently beneficiaries pay the bill out of their very limited income," she said, adding, "Some may choose to forgo the care that they need because they are concerned that the bill will go to collections, which is too often the case, and they know that they are unable to pay."

The state Department of Health Care Services said it is working on a notice to clarify the law for providers (Los Angeles Times, 9/18).

___________________________
Essentially, patients who are Medicare/Medi-Cal essentially have no secondary. I was recently told in an email from Medi-Cal, "when the reimbursement by Medicare is greater than what Medi-Cal will pay, there would be no residue to recoup." This email came after I asked for the COA's help with a bunch of outstanding secondary claims for people with Medi/Medi coverage. Everyone knows that Medicare payments are ALWAYS higher than Medi-Cal payments, so therefore we will not get paid by the secondary for Medi/Medi patients. And we can't balance bill. Isn't that lovely?