GLP-1s may double risk for development of wet AMD - Healio

Just as an aside (and as a teaser) Dr. Julie Rodman will be giving a talk about the ocular effects of GLP1 analogs at CEwire2026.

More details to follow as the site goes live in a couple of weeks

-- ad
 
Now that Celebes are marketing online doctors and prescribing and the Trump Administration is working to lower the price this is more relevant.
 
Last edited:
The increase was from 0.1% to 0.2%. So double, but still very small.
The relative risk is incredibly small, since the base was small. I would say for many people the systemic benefits far outweigh the risk, especially if someone is morbidly obese.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Stickel
The relative risk is incredibly small, since the base was small. I would say for many people the systemic benefits far outweigh the risk, especially if someone is morbidly obese.
Don't you mean absolute risk? The relative risk doubled, the absolute risk is small.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike Alvarez
Just as an aside (and as a teaser) Dr. Julie Rodman will be giving a talk about the ocular effects of GLP1 analogs at CEwire2026.

More details to follow as the site goes live in a couple of weeks

-- ad
Just as you Adam predict AI has problems as well as good I believe long term more and more problems and health concerns with emerge from GPL1 drugs. Yes they may help type II diabetics more then hurt but for the general population who take it to be stick figures watch out for those long term effects. You are changing basic function of the GI system " GLP-1, leading to increased insulin secretion, reduced glucagon secretion, delayed gastric emptying, and appetite suppression, thereby improving glycemic control and promoting weight loss."

Sounds good but let's wait a few years and see what may happen
 
  • Like
Reactions: William R. Hall
Don't you mean absolute risk? The relative risk doubled, the absolute risk is small.
Yup, both are still low, relative to the effects of morbid obesity. Which is what these drugs really should be used for.

Because Steve is correct, the long-term effects of the drugs are unknown. Especially for people who are using them cosmetically [which is the majority of the people taking them, to knock 20 or 30 lbs off] they may get more than they bargained for.

Time will tell ...
 
Just as you Adam predict AI has problems as well as good I believe long term more and more problems and health concerns with emerge from GPL1 drugs. Yes they may help type II diabetics more then hurt but for the general population who take it to be stick figures watch out for those long term effects. You are changing basic function of the GI system " GLP-1, leading to increased insulin secretion, reduced glucagon secretion, delayed gastric emptying, and appetite suppression, thereby improving glycemic control and promoting weight loss."

Sounds good but let's wait a few years and see what may happen
Yet obesity is behind most of the health issues we face as a nation, so obese patients will probably still come out ahead.
 
Yet obesity is behind most of the health issues we face as a nation, so obese patients will probably still come out ahead.
Err even with the cost reductions Trump just put in most people who are obese still can't afford it especially if they are presumably on other meds which I would suspect
 
Couple of things...read that the cost reductions applied to MR/MD programs...anyone hear about cost reductions to those not on MR/MD? Also, was surprised that the effect is short-term requiring continued usage and continued cost.

Is there an end point for GLP-1 usage or the same as metformin forever?
 
Couple of things...read that the cost reductions applied to MR/MD programs...anyone hear about cost reductions to those not on MR/MD? Also, was surprised that the effect is short-term requiring continued usage and continued cost.

Is there an end point for GLP-1 usage or the same as metformin forever?
End point presumably is when you've lost enough weight until you're no longer type 2 / your HBA1c moves back into a normal range.

The problem is going to be keeping the weight off long term without it.
 
End point presumably is when you've lost enough weight until you're no longer type 2 / your HBA1c moves back into a normal range.

The problem is going to be keeping the weight off long term without it.
I have noticed that news anchors and entertainers that seemed to have healthy builds and were not obese, are now thin. People that are high wage earners that are constantly in the public spotlight. They likely have trainers and dieticians they have followed for decades, but now they have magically gone from "regular" to thin.

We also have an elected official in our state that had/has a reputation for being fat. They also have a reputation for having very deep pockets. Never seemed to lose an ounce. Now I joke that they most have bought a pharma company and are using the product, because, in my opinion, in the past month or two, they are looking thinner.

GLP-1 seems to be on the bucket list for people on TV and in the public spotlight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Steve Silberberg
Not only public figures. My daughter lives in an very affluent area of Boca with homes routinely going for $5 Million + and 7000 sq. ft.+ She is in shape naturally but all the girls that are friends are now sticks and admit to taking GLP-1 drugs that they can easily afford. So the rich get thinner.

Not only that she has observed a great % increase in female births vs males in this population. Women want girls rather then boys I guess. She sees school enrollments 70-75% female through IBF and genetic choice. It is noted in her kids classes in kindergarten and preschool so a recent trend